The latest podcast episode asks if white racists are different than their people-of-color counterparts, and how and why.
White racism is unique - in as far as it makes this claim of being non-violent. Also, it is true that “everyone is racist,” or even perhaps that other races are more racist than whites. But nowhere else do you find racism that isn’t either enforced by violence or at least conscious of the violent charge of its claims.
True white racists today are people who seem constantly scandalized that the world doesn’t accept their “scientific” proofs of superiority and that it would rather lash out violently against them. It’s weird and quite perverted. The violence seems to be sublimated into a type of pervy sadomasochism. A lot of racist X accounts give off a strong homoerotic whiff.
The autistic insistence on the factual, scientific truth of white superiority is a sign of defeat. Normally, those staking claims of superiority are acutely aware that their ideology is violent, and they are ready for and often already practicing the violence.
On the other hand, contemporary white racists publicizing their opinions of Darwinian superiority without violent consequences is only possible in the non-Darwinian, tolerant culture of the West. It is somewhat analogous to white suburban kids listening to Death Metal glorifying Satan – it is a case of being spoiled by too much civilization. Too non-violent of an environment.
The net result of this autistic, non-violent racism is that it channels energies into inconsequential theorizing and away from any serious or indeed violent protection of one's ethnos and culture — away from Building Back Boundaries™ around them. I would advise anyone interested in such real-life action to be wary of all the faggy supremacist accounts on X and elsewhere.
Share this post